中国突破美国科技封锁，有一个被忽视的人类意义

非常感谢Nowiak教授的约请，给我这个时机与各位分享对中国高科技政策与中美关系的看法。

我起首想和各位聊一聊高科技霸权对举世安全的威胁。固然，我起主要说，高科技带给人们许多便利，但另一方面，智能科技革命正在形成新的技能鸿沟。这是非常必要鉴戒的。

在举世20大经济体中，8个是国家，另有9家是高科技公司，微软、苹果、英伟达、谷歌、亚马逊以及特斯拉、台积电、博通（Broadcom）、三星。高科技公司数量超过国家数量。更紧张的是，高科技公司的气力，已超过天下绝大多数国家的气力。

高科技公司通过数据算法、信息通讯使用了天下上绝大多数人的思索，甚至使用推举。

许多证据已表明，美国当局与高科技公司互助，正在形成新的科技霸权，美国在举世设立600多个军事基地，正在监视全天下，包罗有大概监视我们每一个人。

在这种高科技霸权的品级制结构中，欧洲、日本都已变成弱国。其他国家与地区，根本没有高科技公司，都必须依赖于美国。这是对举世安全新的最大威胁。

我不知道，你们是否知道一个新词，叫“认知战”，那就是使用高科技影响人们的认知与思索。题目是，谁在对我们发动这场“认知战”？我们必须思索，我们必须产生文化自发意识。

第二点，我想与各位分享中国科技崛起的意义。

已往10年，中国是天下上唯逐一个在高科技自主创新方面摆脱美国控制的国家。中国正在成为一个独立的高科技气力，而且乐意划一、自由地分享科技产物，包罗5G基站、新能源车、光伏产物等。

现在中国结构的5G基站占天下的60%，但价格只有美国主导的40%，更自制，且性能更好。

中国品牌的新能源车占据天下的70%以上，但均匀价格只有美国主导的2/3；中国光伏产业占全天下市场份额80%以上，价格是20年前由美国、日本把持时期的10%。

非常显着，中国正在让整个天下享有更优惠、更划一的高科技生存。用不了多久，我们的电脑体系会更自制，而不是只能用微软一家；芯片也会更自制，由于中国正在崛起。

由此看，中国的反高科技把持，正是美国要遏制中国、发动高科技战的本质原因。

末了一点，我想与大家分享的是，我们必要科技的共同进步。

中国明确反对美国“小院高墙”的科技政策。科技属于全人类，不能成为一个国家霸权的工具，也不能成为一个国家得到暴利把持的工具。

现在中国每年约莫向全天下投资1500亿美元，是举世最大的对外投资国家之一，此中相当大一部分是工业投资、科技投资。中国从来不生存科技转让与分享。

已往两年，我曾调研过、波兰、、、等30多个国家，我亲眼看到了中国在各个国家投资的科技互助盼望。

是的，我们必要科技划一、科技创新、科技分享、科技进步。

如果没有科技的共同进步，许多国家仍旧会在高科技霸权的把持之下。如果那样，将来，非洲发展没有盼望，拉丁美洲没有盼望，中东欧也没有盼望，包罗波兰也没有盼望。

更糟糕的是，我再简单地举行假想，如果一些国家的大公司控制AI，再由AI控制天下，天下会变得更伤害。这是一个非常严厉的话题。对此，中国已经提出了“举世AI管理倡议”，欧洲也有类似的假想，我们可以多互助。

再次感谢约请。

Thank you very much for the invitation from Professor Nowiak. Thank you for giving me such a great opportunity to share my views on China's high-tech policiesand the relationship between China and the United States.

I would first like to talk about the threat of high-tech hegemony to global security. Of course, the first thing I want to say is that high-tech brings people a lot of convenience, but on the other hand, the intelligent technology revolution is forming a new technological divide or gap. This requires great vigilance.

Among the top 20 economies in the world, 8 are countries and 9 are high-tech companies, including Microsoft, Apple, (Nvidia), Google, Amazon, (Tesla), TSMC, Broadcom, and Samsung. The number of high-tech companies exceeds the number of countries. More importantly, the power of high-tech companies has surpassed that of the vast majority of countries in the world.

High tech companies manipulate the thinking of the vast majority of the world's population and even manipulate elections through data algorithms and information communication.

Many pieces of evidence have shown that, the US government is collaborating with high-tech companies to form a new technological hegemony. The US has established over 600 military bases worldwide and is monitoring the entire world, including potentially every one of us now.

In this hierarchical structure of high-tech hegemony, Europe and Japan have both become weak countries. Other countries and regions generally do not have high-tech companies and must rely on the United States. This is the biggest new threat to global security.

I don't know whether you know a new term called ‘cognitive warfare’, which refers to the use of high technology to influence people's cognition and thinking. The question is, who is waging this ‘cognitive war’ against us? We must think, we must generate cultural consciousness.

Secondly, I would like to share with you the significance of China's technological rise. In the past decade, China has been the only country in the world to break free from United States’ control in high-tech independent innovation.

China is becoming an independent high-tech force and is willing to share technology products equally and freely, including 5G stations, new energy vehicles, photovoltaic products, etc. At present, China's 5G stations account for 60% of the world's total, but China’s prices are only 40% of those dominated by the United States, which is cheaper and has better performance; Chinese brands account for 70%or more of the world's new energy vehicles, but their average prices are only 2/3 of those dominated by the United States; The Chinese photovoltaic industry accounts for over 80% of the global market share, and its price is only 10% of what it was 20 years ago when it was monopolized by the United States and Japan. So it is very obvious that China is providing the whole world with a more favorable and equal high-tech lifestyle.

It would not be long before our computer system becomes cheaper, instead of relying on Microsoft; Chips will also be cheaper because China is rising now. From this perspective, China's anti high-tech monopoly is the fundamental reason why the United States wants to contain China and launch a high-tech war.

The third point, also the last point I want to share with everyone is that we need the common progress of high-tech. China opposes the United States' "small courtyard, high wall" technology policy. Technology belongs to all mankind and cannot become a tool for a country's hegemony, nor can it become a tool for a country to gain huge profits and monopolize.

Now China invests $150 billion annually in the world, making it one of the largest outward investor in the world, with a significant portion of this investment coming from industrial and technological sectors. China has never reserved technology skills, transfer and sharing. In the past two years, I have conducted research in over 30 countries including Brazil, Poland, Indonesia, the UAE, and Russia. I have personally witnessed the progress of China's technological cooperation in investing in various countries. Yes, we need technological equality, technological innovation, technological sharing, and technological progress.

Without the common progress of technology, many countries will still be under the monopoly of high-tech hegemony. If that's the case, there will be no hope for Africa's development in the future, no hope for Latin America, no hope for Central and Eastern Europe, including Poland.

Even worse, if I simply imagine that some large companies in certain countries control AI, and then AI controls the world, the world will become even more dangerous. This is a very serious topic. In response, China has proposed the "Global AI Governance Initiative", and Europe has similar ideas. So I think we can cooperate more in the future.

Thank you again for the wonderful invitation. Thank you.